What is the best practice when sharing information about witnesses or suspects?

• A. include full personal details publicly
• B. share only necessary information and avoid unnecessary identification
• C. never share any information
• D. share only after contacting media

Answer: (B)

Sharing information about witnesses or suspects should provide what helps the investigation while protecting people from harm or unwarranted identification. The best practice is to reveal only what is necessary for others to assist or locate someone, and to avoid details that aren’t essential or that could expose someone to risk or bias.

For witnesses, share enough to help contact them and understand what they observed—what, where, and when they saw something, along with how they can be reached. Do not publicize full names, home addresses, personal contact information, or other identifying data unless it’s explicitly required by policy or legal process. This keeps the focus on gathering accurate information without exposing the witness to harassment or privacy invasion.

For suspects, provide descriptors and information that aid recognition or location—such as approximate age range, height, clothing, distinguishing features, direction last seen, vehicle type or color—without releasing unverified allegations, sensitive personal data, or uncharged accusations. The goal is to support the investigation and public safety while preserving due process and avoiding sensationalism or prejudice.

In practice, coordinate releases with the appropriate public information office and follow department policies on information sharing. Use the minimum necessary details and redact or withhold anything not essential. This approach helps the public help with the case, reduces the risk of misidentification or harm, and maintains trust in the investigation.